PalTalk Holdings, Inc. v. Valve Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Delaware District Court PalTalk Holdings, Inc. v. Valve Corporation

PalTalk Holdings, Inc. v. Valve Corporation

Plaintiff:	PalTalk Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:	Valve Corporation
Case Number:	1:2016cv01239
Filed:	December 16, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office:	Wilmington Office
County:	New Castle
Presiding Judge:	Sue L. Robinson
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 2, 2018	Filing 60 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 47 Report and Recommendations. 1. Defendant's motion for a change of venue, Filing No. 19 , is granted; 2. The report and recommendation, Filing No. 47 , is adopted in its entirety; and 3. The Clerk of Court is ordered to transfer this case to the Western District of Washington. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 2/1/2018. (fms)
October 13, 2017	Filing 47 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS- GRANTING 19 MOTION to Transfer Case to Western District of Washington. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no long er than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 10/30/2017. Signed by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 10/13/2017. (lih)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 2, 2018

Filing 60 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 47 Report and Recommendations. 1. Defendant's motion for a change of venue, Filing No. 19 , is granted; 2. The report and recommendation, Filing No. 47 , is adopted in its entirety; and 3. The Clerk of Court is ordered to transfer this case to the Western District of Washington. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 2/1/2018. (fms)

October 13, 2017

Filing 47 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS- GRANTING 19 MOTION to Transfer Case to Western District of Washington. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no long er than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 10/30/2017. Signed by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 10/13/2017. (lih)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PalTalk Holdings, Inc. v. Valve Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: PalTalk Holdings, Inc.
Represented By:	Matthew S. Compton, Jr.
Represented By:	John G. Day
Represented By:	Andrew Colin Mayo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Valve Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?