Labreck v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
| Peter Joshua Labreck |
| Bank of America, N.A. and Brian Moynihan |
| 1:2017cv00015 |
| January 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Sue L. Robinson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/7/2018. (nms)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM ORDER: The motion to amend is DENIED (D.I. 30 ), the request for subpoenas is DENIED (D.I. 27 ). Plaintiff shall request Clerk to issue summons. Plaintiff shall return to Clerk USM 285 form(s) and service copies. Upon receipt, the U. S. Marshal shall personally serve process as directed by plaintiff. Plaintiff shall also complete and return to the Clerk of Court original "U.S. Marshal-285" form(s) and a copy of the complaint (D.I. 3 ), amended complaint (D.I. 9 ), and addendum to amended complaint (D.I. 11 ) for personal service upon Experian. Failure to request issuance of summons and to provide a "U.S. Marshal 285" form containing a complete address for defendant and a copy of the complaint, amended complaint, and addendum to amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this order may result in the dismissal of Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).(Copy to pltf.) Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/6/2017. (nmg) Modified on 11/6/2017 (nms).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
