Blackbird Tech LLC v. INRIX, Inc.
Plaintiff: Blackbird Tech LLC doing business as Blackbird Technologies
Defendant: INRIX, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2017cv00877
Filed: June 30, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
County: New Castle
Presiding Judge: Vacant Judgeship (2017)
Referring Judge: Christopher J Burke
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2018 Filing 17 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,400,190 B2. (dlb)
January 17, 2018 Filing 16 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Blackbird Tech LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios)
January 17, 2018 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED D.I. #16 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Blackbird Tech LLC, ***Civil Case Terminated. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/17/2018. (dlb)
January 17, 2018 CORRECTING ENTRY: The Stipulation filed 1/16/18 at D.I. 16 has been removed from the docket to be refiled. The Stipulation was filed without signatures. (dlb)
October 26, 2017 Opinion or Order ORAL ORDER: The Case Management/Scheduling Conference set for 11/6/2017 at 03:00 PM before Judge Christopher J. Burke will be rescheduled at the request of counsel. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/26/2017. (dlb)
October 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Order Resetting Telephonic Case Management/Scheduling Conference: A Case Management/Scheduling Conference is set for 11/13/2017 at 01:30 PM before Judge Christopher J. Burke. Because the proposed order is without any disputes, only Delaware counsel should appear in person. Outside counsel may participate telephonically. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/26/2017. (dlb)
October 26, 2017 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jonathan R. Putman for INRIX, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (ceg)
October 25, 2017 Filing 15 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jonathan R. Putman - filed by INRIX, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Keller, Karen)
October 25, 2017 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED D.I. #15 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jonathan R. Putman filed by INRIX, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/25/2017. (dlb)
October 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Order Setting Telephonic Scheduling Conference: A Case Management/Scheduling Conference is set for 11/6/2017 at 03:00 PM before Judge Christopher J. Burke. Because the proposed order is without any disputes, only Delaware counsel should appear in person. Outside counsel may participate telephonically. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/23/2017. (dlb)
October 20, 2017 Filing 14 Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Stamatios Stamoulis regarding Scheduling Order. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Stamoulis, Stamatios)
October 4, 2017 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, D.I. #13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to file (i) a copy of the Case Management Checklist; (ii) a proposed Scheduling Order; and (iii) a letter that contains a description of the case, the parties positions regarding any disputes in the proposed Scheduling Order filed by INRIX, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/4/2017. (dlb)
October 3, 2017 Filing 13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to file (i) a copy of the Case Management Checklist; (ii) a proposed Scheduling Order; and (iii) a letter that contains a description of the case, the parties positions regarding any disputes in the proposed Scheduling Order, and a list of the three most significant topics discussed during the parties' review of the Checklist items to October 20, 2017 - filed by INRIX, Inc.. (Keller, Karen)
September 25, 2017 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED D.I. #12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to October 5, 2017 filed by Blackbird Tech LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 9/25/2017. (dlb)
September 22, 2017 Filing 12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to October 5, 2017 - filed by Blackbird Tech LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios)
August 24, 2017 Opinion or Order ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and discuss, in person and/or by telephone, each of the matters listed on Judge Burkes Case Management Checklist (Checklist). Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall jointly file the following: (I) a copy of the Checklist, indicating the names of Lead Counsel and Delaware Counsel for each party; (ii) a proposed Scheduling Order consistent with Judge Burkes Rule 16 Scheduling Order Patent; and (iii) a letter, not to exceed three pages, that contains the following: (a) a description of what this case is about; (b) the parties positions regarding any disputes in the proposed Scheduling Order, and (c) a list of the three most significant topics (other than Scheduling Order disputes) discussed during the parties review of the Checklist items, along with a brief description as to what was discussed as to those topics. Thereafter, the Court may schedule an in-person Case Management Conference/Rule 16 Scheduling Conference to be held with Judge Burke. The Checklist and Rule 16 Scheduling Order Patent can be found on this Court's website (http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/judge/magistrate-judge-christopher-j-burke).Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/24/2017. (dlb)
August 23, 2017 Filing 11 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by INRIX, Inc.. (Keller, Karen)
August 23, 2017 Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with JURY DEMAND by INRIX, Inc..(Keller, Karen)
August 7, 2017 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Ryan J. McBrayer for INRIX, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (crb)
August 7, 2017 Pro Hac Vice Attorney John E. Handy for Blackbird Tech LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (lmm)
August 7, 2017 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Wendy H. Verlander for Blackbird Tech LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (lmm)
August 7, 2017 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christopher Freeman, John Handy, and Wendy Verlander filed by Blackbird Tech LLC, #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ryan J. McBrayer filed by INRIX, Inc.. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/7/2017. (dlb)
August 7, 2017 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Christopher R. Freeman for Blackbird Tech LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (lmm)
July 27, 2017 Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christopher Freeman, John Handy, and Wendy Verlander - filed by Blackbird Tech LLC. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Stamoulis, Stamatios)
July 27, 2017 Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ryan J. McBrayer - filed by INRIX, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Keller, Karen)
July 21, 2017 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED D.I. #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (and proposed order) to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to August 23, 2017 filed by INRIX, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 7/21/2017. (dlb)
July 20, 2017 Filing 7 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by INRIX, Inc.. (Keller, Karen)
July 20, 2017 Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (and proposed order) to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to August 23, 2017 - filed by INRIX, Inc.. (Keller, Karen)
July 18, 2017 REMARK: The parties should be aware that the Court encourages the participation of newer attorneys in courtroom proceedings and at oral argument. Please see the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtroom Opportunities for Newer Attorneys, a link to which is provided here for the parties' convenience:#http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/forms/StandingOrder2017.pdf (dlb)
July 18, 2017 REMARK: If the parties jointly consent to have a Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, then when Judge Burke enters a case schedule he will enter the respective pre-trial conference and trial dates onto his calendar and will honor them. Otherwise, in accordance with the District Court's procedures for "Assignment of Cases to Visiting Judges" (issued on May 26, 2017 and available on the District Court's website), then upon the filing of a case-dispositive motion (e.g., a motion to dismiss, a motion for judgment on the pleadings, a motion for summary judgment, or initiation of the claim construction process in a patent case), VAC cases will be considered ready for reassignment to a visiting District Judge. Whether the pre-trial conference and trial dates will stand after reassignment will depend on the availability of those dates on the visiting District Judge's calendar. (dlb)
July 14, 2017 Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Blackbird Tech LLC. INRIX, Inc. served on 7/3/2017, answer due 7/24/2017. (Stamoulis, Stamatios)
July 5, 2017 Case Assigned to Vacant Judgeship (2017). Please include initials of VAC after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
July 5, 2017 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke. (This matter has been assigned to the Vacant Judgeship and referred to a Magistrate Judge for handling through case-dispositive motions. The Magistrate Judge has full authority permitted by law to manage this matter, including entering schedules through trial, deciding non-dispositive matters and making recommendations as to the resolution of dispositive matters. Litigants and counsel are reminded that they have the option of consenting to the Magistrate Judge to handle the case in full, including trial, or consenting to having a particular motion resolved by the Magistrate Judge.) (rjb)
July 3, 2017 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to INRIX, Inc. on 7/3/2017. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (crb)
June 30, 2017 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Blackbird Tech LLC. (crb)
June 30, 2017 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,400,190 B2. (crb)
June 30, 2017 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (crb)
June 30, 2017 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against INRIX, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2175539.) - filed by Blackbird Tech LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(crb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blackbird Tech LLC v. INRIX, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Blackbird Tech LLC doing business as Blackbird Technologies
Represented By: Stamatios Stamoulis
Represented By: Christopher R. Freeman
Represented By: John E. Handy
Represented By: Richard Charles Weinblatt
Represented By: Wendy H. Verlander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INRIX, Inc.
Represented By: Jonathan R. Putman
Represented By: Karen Elizabeth Keller
Represented By: Ryan J. McBrayer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?