Blackbird Tech LLC v. INRIX, Inc.
Blackbird Tech LLC doing business as Blackbird Technologies |
INRIX, Inc. |
1:2017cv00877 |
June 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
New Castle |
Vacant Judgeship (2017) |
Christopher J Burke |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 0145 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,400,190 B2. (dlb) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Blackbird Tech LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
|
CORRECTING ENTRY: The Stipulation filed 1/16/18 at D.I. 16 has been removed from the docket to be refiled. The Stipulation was filed without signatures. (dlb) |
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jonathan R. Putman for INRIX, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (ceg) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jonathan R. Putman - filed by INRIX, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Keller, Karen) |
|
|
Filing 14 Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Stamatios Stamoulis regarding Scheduling Order. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
|
Filing 13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to file (i) a copy of the Case Management Checklist; (ii) a proposed Scheduling Order; and (iii) a letter that contains a description of the case, the parties positions regarding any disputes in the proposed Scheduling Order, and a list of the three most significant topics discussed during the parties' review of the Checklist items to October 20, 2017 - filed by INRIX, Inc.. (Keller, Karen) |
|
Filing 12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to October 5, 2017 - filed by Blackbird Tech LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
|
Filing 11 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by INRIX, Inc.. (Keller, Karen) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with JURY DEMAND by INRIX, Inc..(Keller, Karen) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Ryan J. McBrayer for INRIX, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (crb) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney John E. Handy for Blackbird Tech LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (lmm) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Wendy H. Verlander for Blackbird Tech LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (lmm) |
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Christopher R. Freeman for Blackbird Tech LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (lmm) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christopher Freeman, John Handy, and Wendy Verlander - filed by Blackbird Tech LLC. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ryan J. McBrayer - filed by INRIX, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Keller, Karen) |
|
Filing 7 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by INRIX, Inc.. (Keller, Karen) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (and proposed order) to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to August 23, 2017 - filed by INRIX, Inc.. (Keller, Karen) |
REMARK: The parties should be aware that the Court encourages the participation of newer attorneys in courtroom proceedings and at oral argument. Please see the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtroom Opportunities for Newer Attorneys, a link to which is provided here for the parties' convenience:#http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/forms/StandingOrder2017.pdf (dlb) |
REMARK: If the parties jointly consent to have a Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, then when Judge Burke enters a case schedule he will enter the respective pre-trial conference and trial dates onto his calendar and will honor them. Otherwise, in accordance with the District Court's procedures for "Assignment of Cases to Visiting Judges" (issued on May 26, 2017 and available on the District Court's website), then upon the filing of a case-dispositive motion (e.g., a motion to dismiss, a motion for judgment on the pleadings, a motion for summary judgment, or initiation of the claim construction process in a patent case), VAC cases will be considered ready for reassignment to a visiting District Judge. Whether the pre-trial conference and trial dates will stand after reassignment will depend on the availability of those dates on the visiting District Judge's calendar. (dlb) |
Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Blackbird Tech LLC. INRIX, Inc. served on 7/3/2017, answer due 7/24/2017. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
Case Assigned to Vacant Judgeship (2017). Please include initials of VAC after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke. (This matter has been assigned to the Vacant Judgeship and referred to a Magistrate Judge for handling through case-dispositive motions. The Magistrate Judge has full authority permitted by law to manage this matter, including entering schedules through trial, deciding non-dispositive matters and making recommendations as to the resolution of dispositive matters. Litigants and counsel are reminded that they have the option of consenting to the Magistrate Judge to handle the case in full, including trial, or consenting to having a particular motion resolved by the Magistrate Judge.) (rjb) |
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to INRIX, Inc. on 7/3/2017. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (crb) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Blackbird Tech LLC. (crb) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,400,190 B2. (crb) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (crb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against INRIX, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2175539.) - filed by Blackbird Tech LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(crb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.