Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al v. Hospira, Inc.
| Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Par Sterile Products, LLC and Endo Par Innovation Company, LLC |
| Hospira, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv00944 |
| July 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Vacant Judgeship (2017) |
| Mary Pat Thynge |
| Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
229
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on November 13, 2019. (lak)
|
|
Filing
197
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiffs Motion in Limine (D.I. 193 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 6/21/2019. (amf)
|
|
Filing
191
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Denying 174 Request for Oral Argument filed by Hospira, Inc., and Denying 149 MOTION to Preclude Expert Testimony of Karen M. Becker Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 filed by Hospira, Inc.. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 6/6/19. (gvw)
|
|
Filing
190
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The plaintiffs' objections (D.I. 139 ) are OVERRULED. The Magistrate Judge's oral order (D.I. 139-1, Ex. 5, Tr. at 19-26) is AFFIRMED and adopted in all respects. The plaintiffs' letter request for sanctions (D.I. 124 ) is DENIED (*see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 6/3/2019. (ceg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
