McCardell v. Harewood et al
| James N. McCardell |
| Harewood and Medical Staff |
| 1:2017cv01121 |
| August 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Richard G. Andrews |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/24/2020. (nms)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM ORDER:(1) the motions to compel (D.I. 41, 67) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; (2) Defendant shall produce the contract between Defendant and the Delaware Department of Correction on or before June 4, 2019; (3) the motion to compel (D.I. 63) is DENIED; (4) the motion to supplement the request for counsel (D.I. 74) is DISMISSED as moot; and (5) the request for counsel (D.I. 74) is DENIED without prejudice to renew. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/30/2019. (myr)
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/19/2018. (nms)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/25/18. (sar)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM re 9 Motion for Injunctive Relief for medical care and a medical diet. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/30/2018. (nms)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/26/2017. (ceg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
