Howard v. Coupe et al
| Kevin Howard |
| Robert Coupe, David Pierce, Ronald Hosterman and Michael Little |
| 1:2017cv01548 |
| October 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Richard G. Andrews |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
MEMORANDUM OPINION Providing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: Plaintiff has not proven his claim of retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/22/2021. (nms)
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and [to] Set a New Scheduling Order (D.I. 93 ) is DENIED. Defendant's corresponding Motion for Protective order (D.I. 92 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/31/2021. (nms)
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/14/2020. (nms)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Motion for Order to Obtain Location of Persons with Discoverable Information (D.I. 47 ) is DENIED. The Motion for Defendant to Supplement Answers to Interrogatories (D.I. 49 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant is ordered to supplement the answers to Interrogatories 18 and 21 on or before March 5, 2020 (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/4/2020. (nms)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/10/2019. (nms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
