Amigo, Inc. v. Rittenhouse Payment Solutions, LLC et al
| Amigo, Inc. |
| Rittenhouse Payment Solutions, LLC and Todd Wrubel |
| 1:2017cv01835 |
| December 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Vacant Judgeship (2017) |
| Sherry R Fallon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE CLOSED per D.I. #5 . (lih) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Amigo, Inc. as to Defendants Rittenhouse Payment Solutions, LLC and Todd Wrubel with Prejudice (Brauerman, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Todd Wrubel on December 21, 2017, filed by Amigo, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Brauerman, Stephen) |
| **NOTE: If the parties jointly consent to Magistrate Judge Fallons jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in this case, then the Pretrial Conference and Trial will be presided over by Judge Fallon consistent with 28 U.S.C. 636. Otherwise, in accordance with the District Court's procedures for "Assignment of Cases to Visiting Judges" (issued May 26, 2017 and available on the District Court's website), upon the filing of a case-dispositive motion (e.g., a motion to dismiss, a motion for judgment on the pleadings, a motion for summary judgment, or initiation of the claim construction process in a patent case), VAC cases will be reassigned to a visiting District Judge, and any further dates in the Scheduling Order, including the Pretrial Conference and Trial dates, may be adjusted dependent on the availability of the visiting District Judge.** (lih) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Sherry R. Fallon. (This matter has been assigned to the Vacant Judgeship and referred to a Magistrate Judge for handling through case-dispositive motions. The Magistrate Judge has full authority permitted by law to manage this matter, including entering schedules through trial, deciding non-dispositive matters and making recommendations as to the resolution of dispositive matters. Litigants and counsel are reminded that they have the option of consenting to the Magistrate Judge to handle the case in full, including trial, or consenting to having a particular motion resolved by the Magistrate Judge.) (rjb) |
| Case Assigned to Vacant Judgeship (2017). Please include initials of VAC after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amigo, Inc.. Rittenhouse Payment Solutions, LLC served on 12/21/2017, answer due 1/11/2018. (Brauerman, Stephen) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Rittenhouse Payment Solutions, LLC on 12/21/2017; Todd Wrubel on 12/21/2017. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (sar) |
| CORRECTING ENTRY: The pdf of Exhibit A to the Complaint (D.I. #1 ) has been replaced with a corrected version per request of counsel. (nmfn) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Rittenhouse Payment Solutions, LLC, Todd Wrubel - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2289264.) - filed by Amigo, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(sar) (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/21/2017) (nmfn, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
