KOM Software Inc. v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
| KOM Software Inc. |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and DreamWorks Animation, LLC |
| 1:2018cv00159 |
| January 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Gregory M Sleet |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED - re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to Complaint to April 6, 2018 filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, DreamWorks Animation, LLC, Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: DreamWorks Animation, LLC answer due 4/6/2018; Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company answer due 4/6/2018.. Ordered by Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 2/20/2018. (mdb)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to Complaint to April 6, 2018 - filed by DreamWorks Animation, LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. (Dudash, Amy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy Michele Dudash on behalf of DreamWorks Animation, LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Dudash, Amy) |
|
SO ORDERED - re (4 in 1:18-cv-00158-GMS, 4 in 1:18-cv-00160-GMS, 4 in 1:18-cv-00159-GMS) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew G. DiNovo, Christopher V. Goodpastor, and Alexander H. Martin filed by KOM Software Inc.. Ordered by Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 2/2/2018. Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-00158-GMS, 1:18-cv-00159-GMS, 1:18-cv-00160-GMS(mdb)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Alexander H. Martin,Andrew G. DiNovo,Christopher V. Goodpastor for KOM Software Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-00159-GMS, 1:18-cv-00160-GMS(crb) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by KOM Software Inc.. DreamWorks Animation, LLC served on 1/29/2018, answer due 2/20/2018; Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company served on 1/29/2018, answer due 2/20/2018. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew G. DiNovo, Christopher V. Goodpastor, and Alexander H. Martin - filed by KOM Software Inc.. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory M. Sleet. Please include the initials of the Judge (GMS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-00158-GMS, 1:18-cv-00159-GMS, 1:18-cv-00160-GMS (rjb) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,438,642 B1; US 7,392,234 B2; US 6,654,864 B2; US 7,076,624 B2; US 7,536,524 B2; US 8,234,477 B2; US 9,361,243 B2. (nmg) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against DreamWorks Animation, LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2310624.) - filed by KOM Software Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to DreamWorks Animation, LLC on 1/29/2018; Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company on 1/29/2018. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
