Maxell, Ltd. v. Olympus Corporation et al
| Maxell, Ltd. |
| Olympus America Inc. and Olympus Corporation |
| 1:2018cv00310 |
| February 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Sherry R Fallon |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL re Maxell, Ltd.: Entry of appearance of attorney Timothy Devlin. Attorney Benjamin J. Schladweiler terminated. (Devlin, Timothy) |
Filing 9
ORDER regarding discovery and markman proceedings. Signed by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 3/27/2018. Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-00216-JFB-SRF, 1:18-cv-00310-JFB-SRF(lih)
|
|
SO ORDERED- re #8 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Olympus America Inc. answer due 4/27/2018; Olympus Corporation answer due 4/27/2018. Signed by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 3/13/2018. (lih)
|
| Filing 8 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Olympus America and Olympus Corp. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to April 27, 2018 - filed by Maxell, Ltd.. (Schladweiler, Benjamin) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Saqib J. Siddiqui,William J. Barrow,Tiffany A. Miller,Michael L. Lindinger,Kfir B. Levy,Jamie B. Beaber,James A. Fussell, III,Ilhwan (Justin) Park,Bryan C. Nese,Paul B. Baldine for Maxell, Ltd. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (crb) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Amanda S. Bonner for Maxell, Ltd. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (ceg) |
|
Filing 7
ORAL ORDER: Pursuant to the filing of this case, the Court issues the following order: This case shall be immediately referred to Magistrate Judge Sherry R. Fallon. Magistrate Judge Fallon shall issue a scheduling order when appropriate. Magistrate Judge Fallon shall handle all dispositive and nondispositive matters on all issues, including claim construction, except for summary judgments, Daubert motions and pretrial motions in limine. On all dispositive matters, the magistrate judge shall issue a report and ecommendation. The parties have the right to file objections to the report and recommendation, or in the case of nondispositive matters, file an appeal of the magistrate judge's order, and the same shall be decided by the undersigned. The magistrate judge shall likewise handle all discovery matters, scheduling, and pretrial conferences. If the parties believe the magistrate judge has a conflict of interest with this case, the parties shall so notify the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 3/5/18. (Brunswick, Amy)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Alison T. Gelsleichter for Maxell, Ltd. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (crb) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Robert G. Pluta for Maxell, Ltd. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (crb) |
|
SO ORDERED- re #5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jamie B. Beaber; Kfir B. Levy; James A. Fussell, III; Tiffany A. Miller; Baldine B. Paul; Ilhwan (Justin) Park; William J. Barrow; Saqib J. Siddiqui; Bryan C. Nese; Michael L. Lindinger; Alison T. Gelsleich. Signed by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 3/2/2018. (lih)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Joseph F. Bataillon of the District of Nebraska (in lieu of Vacant Judgeship). Please include the initials of the Judge (JFB) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Sherry R. Fallon. Motion referred to Sherry R. Fallon.(rjb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Maxell, Ltd.. Olympus America Inc. served on 2/26/2018, answer due 3/19/2018. (Schladweiler, Benjamin) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jamie B. Beaber; Kfir B. Levy; James A. Fussell, III; Tiffany A. Miller; Baldine B. Paul; Ilhwan (Justin) Park; William J. Barrow; Saqib J. Siddiqui; Bryan C. Nese; Michael L. Lindinger; Alison T. Gelsleichter; Robert G. Pluta; and Amanda Streff Bonner - filed by Maxell, Ltd.. (Schladweiler, Benjamin) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Maxell Holdings, Ltd. for Maxell, Ltd. filed by Maxell, Ltd. (crb) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) See Attachment. (crb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (crb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Olympus America Inc., Olympus Corporation - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2329236.) - filed by Maxell, Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - J, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(crb) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Olympus America Inc. on 2/23/2018; Olympus Corporation on 2/23/2018. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (crb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
