Orostream LLC v. NETGEAR, Inc.
Orostream LLC |
NETGEAR, Inc. |
1:2018cv00325 |
February 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
New Castle |
Richard G Andrews |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SO ORDERED, re #8 Stipulation to Stay. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/26/2018. (nms) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION to Stay by Orostream LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to Complaint to April 25, 2018 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: NETGEAR, Inc. answer due 4/25/2018). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/22/2018. (nms) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to April 25, 2018 - filed by Orostream LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney David R. Bennett for Orostream LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (crb) |
SO ORDERED, re (6 in 18-cv-326-RGA, 6 in 18-cv-325-RGA) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett, filed by Orostream LLC. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/14/2018. Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-00325-RGA, 1:18-cv-00326-RGA(nms) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett - filed by Orostream LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-00325-RGA, 1:18-cv-00326-RGA (rjb) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Orostream LLC. NETGEAR, Inc. served on 3/5/2018, answer due 3/26/2018. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to NETGEAR, Inc. on 2/28/2018. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (nmg) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Orostream LLC. (nmg) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 5,768,508. (nmg) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against NETGEAR, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2331920.) - filed by Orostream LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Orostream LLC v. NETGEAR, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: NETGEAR, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Orostream LLC | |
Represented By: | Stamatios Stamoulis |
Represented By: | David R. Bennett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.