Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma Ltd. et al v. Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA et al
Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma Ltd. and Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma France S.A.S. |
Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA, Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. |
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. |
Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma France S.A.S. and Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma Ltd. |
1:2018cv00390 |
March 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
New Castle |
Leonard P. Stark |
Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 325 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 8/18/2022. (dlw) |
Filing 256 MEMORANDUM ORDER DENYING 211 MOTION to Exclude Certain Expert Testimony Concerning Infringement Under Fed. R. Evid. 702, GRANTING-IN-PART and DENYING-IN-PART 215 MOTION to Preclude Portions of the Expert Testimony of Walter Chambliss, Ph .D., DENYING 217 Joint MOTION to Exclude Certain Expert Testimony of Dr. Anjay Rastogi, Dr. Robert O. Williams, III and Carla Mulhern relating to secondary considerations, and GRANTING-IN-PART and DENYING-IN-PART 213 MOTION to Strike. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 8/13/2020. (dlw) |
Filing 114 MEMORANDUM OPINION re claim construction. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/5/19. (ntl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.