Geller v. Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. et al
| Eugene Geller |
| Elizabeth Connolly Alexander, R. Halsey Wise, Rube Jose King-Shaw, Jr., Kenneth R. Goulet, Mala Anand, John Maldonado, Christopher Pike, J. Douglas Williams, James E. Parisi, Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. and David L. Swift |
| 1:2018cv01110 |
| July 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORAL ORDER - The referral of this action to the Magistrate Judge is hereby WITHDRAWN. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/7/2018. (dlw)
|
| Case Reassigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-01149-MN-MPT, 1:18-cv-01110-MN-MPT, 1:18-cv-01193-MN-MPT (rjb) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Eugene Geller re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Van Gorder, Michael) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Regarding Scheduling on Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Eugene Geller. (Van Gorder, Michael) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Shorten Time and for Expedited Hearing re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction - filed by Eugene Geller. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)Motions referred to Mary Pat Thynge.(Van Gorder, Michael) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to ANSWER complaint to 45 days after lead plaintiff(s) files a consolidated amended complaint. See Stipulation for further details and deadlines. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 8/6/2018. (fms)
|
| Filing 6 DECLARATION re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Eugene Geller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Van Gorder, Michael) |
| Filing 5 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Eugene Geller.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/17/2018. (Van Gorder, Michael) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction - filed by Eugene Geller. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)Motions referred to Mary Pat Thynge.(Van Gorder, Michael) |
| Filing 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to ANSWER complaint to 45 days after lead plaintiff(s) files a consolidated amended complaint - filed by Eugene Geller. (Van Gorder, Michael) |
| ***NOTE: If the parties jointly consent to Chief Magistrate Judge Thynge's jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in this case, then the Pretrial Conference and Trial will be presided over by Judge Thynge consistent with 28 U.S.C. 636. Otherwise, in accordance with the District Court's procedures for "Assignment of Cases to Visiting Judges" (issued May 26, 2017 and available on the District Court's website), upon the filing of a case-dispositive motion (e.g., a motion to dismiss, a motion for judgment on the pleadings, a motion for summary judgment, or initiation of the claim construction process in a patent case), VAC cases will be reassigned to a visiting District Judge, and any further dates in the Scheduling Order, including the Pretrial Conference and Trial dates, may be adjusted dependent on the availability of the visiting District Judge. (fms) |
| Case Assigned to Vacant Judgeship (2017). Please include initials of VAC after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge. (This matter has been assigned to the Vacant Judgeship and referred to a Magistrate Judge for handling through case-dispositive motions. The Magistrate Judge has full authority permitted by law to manage this matter, including entering schedules through trial, deciding non-dispositive matters and making recommendations as to the resolution of dispositive matters. Litigants and counsel are reminded that they have the option of consenting to the Magistrate Judge to handle the case in full, including trial, or consenting to having a particular motion resolved by the Magistrate Judge.) (rjb) |
| Remark: Summons mailed per filing party's request. (ceg) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Elizabeth Connolly Alexander, Mala Anand, Cotiviti Holdings, Inc., Kenneth R. Goulet, Rube Jose King-Shaw, Jr, John Maldonado, James E. Parisi, Christopher Pike, David L. Swift, J. Douglas Williams, R. Halsey Wise - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2427827.) - filed by Eugene Geller. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Proposed Lead Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Elizabeth Connolly Alexander on 7/27/2018; Mala Anand on 7/27/2018; Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. on 7/27/2018; Kenneth R. Goulet on 7/27/2018; Rube Jose King-Shaw, Jr on 7/27/2018; John Maldonado on 7/27/2018; James E. Parisi on 7/27/2018; Christopher Pike on 7/27/2018; David L. Swift on 7/27/2018; J. Douglas Williams on 7/27/2018; R. Halsey Wise on 7/27/2018. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
