Cellular Transitions, LLC v. Lenovo Holding Company, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Cellular Transitions, LLC
Defendant: Motorola Mobility LLC, Lenovo (United States), Inc. and Lenovo Holding Company, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv01385
Filed: September 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Leonard P Stark
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2018 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to November 28, 2018 filed by Cellular Transitions, LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 10/23/18. (ntl)
October 19, 2018 Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to November 28, 2018 - filed by Cellular Transitions, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios)
September 26, 2018 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Margaret Elizabeth Day, David L. Alberti, Sal Lim, and Marc C. Belloli for Cellular Transitions, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (ceg)
September 25, 2018 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Margaret Elizabeth Day, David L. Alberti, Sal Lim and Marc Belloli filed by Cellular Transitions, LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/25/18. (ntl)
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint to October 29, 2018 filed by Cellular Transitions, LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/24/18. (ntl)
September 18, 2018 Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint to October 29, 2018 - filed by Cellular Transitions, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios)
September 12, 2018 Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
September 7, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cellular Transitions, LLC. Lenovo Holding Company, Inc. served on 9/6/2018, answer due 9/27/2018. (Stamoulis, Stamatios)
September 7, 2018 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cellular Transitions, LLC. Lenovo (United States), Inc. served on 9/6/2018, answer due 9/27/2018. (Stamoulis, Stamatios)
September 7, 2018 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cellular Transitions, LLC. Motorola Mobility LLC served on 9/6/2018, answer due 9/27/2018. (Stamoulis, Stamatios)
September 6, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Margaret Elizabeth Day, David L. Alberti, Sal Lim and Marc Belloli - filed by Cellular Transitions, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios)
September 6, 2018 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Lenovo (United States), Inc. on 9/6/2018; Lenovo Holding Company, Inc. on 9/6/2018; Motorola Mobility LLC on 9/6/2018. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (nmg)
September 5, 2018 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Other Affiliate Monument Patent Holdings, LLC for Cellular Transitions, LLC filed by Cellular Transitions, LLC. (nmg)
September 5, 2018 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,855,637 B2 ;US 9,888,425 B2. (nmg)
September 5, 2018 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg)
September 5, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Lenovo (United States), Inc., Lenovo Holding Company, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2453748.) - filed by Cellular Transitions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cellular Transitions, LLC v. Lenovo Holding Company, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Motorola Mobility LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lenovo (United States), Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lenovo Holding Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cellular Transitions, LLC
Represented By: Stamatios Stamoulis
Represented By: Richard Charles Weinblatt
Represented By: Sal Lim
Represented By: Margaret Elizabeth Day
Represented By: David L. Alberti
Represented By: Marc C. Belloli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?