Location Based Services, LLC v. Mapillary Inc.
Plaintiff: Location Based Services, LLC
Defendant: Mapillary Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv01425
Filed: September 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Christopher J Burke
Referring Judge: Leonard P Stark
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2018 Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to respond to Complaint to November 19, 2018 - filed by Mapillary Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
October 31, 2018 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED D.I. #10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to respond to Complaint to November 19, 2018 filed by Mapillary Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/31/2018. (dlb)
October 23, 2018 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Joseph R. Klinicki and Michael J. Bonella for Mapillary Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (ceg)
October 22, 2018 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Shuang Zhao for Mapillary Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (ceg)
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED,D.I. #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael J. Bonella, Joseph R. Klinicki, and Shuang Zhao of CONDO ROCCIA KOPTIW LLP filed by Mapillary Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/11/2018. (dlb)
October 10, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael J. Bonella, Joseph R. Klinicki, and Shuang Zhao of CONDO ROCCIA KOPTIW LLP - filed by Mapillary Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SO ORDERED D.I. #7 Proposed Procedures Order filed by Location Based Services, LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/3/2018. (dlb)
October 3, 2018 Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER Procedures Order by Location Based Services, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
October 2, 2018 Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to respond to the complaint to November 5, 2018 - filed by Mapillary Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
October 2, 2018 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED D.I. #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to respond to the complaint to November 5, 2018 filed by Mapillary Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/5/2018. (dlb)
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORAL REFERRAL ORDER: This case will be governed by Judge Stark's Revised Procedures for Managing Patent Cases (see www.ded.uscourts.gov). In accordance with the Revised Procedures, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. any and all matters relating to scheduling, including entry of a Scheduling Order, are referred to Magistrate Judge Burke; 2. any and all motions to dismiss, stay, and/or transfer venue, relating to all or any part of the case, whenever such motions may be filed, are referred to Judge Burke for disposition or report and recommendation, to the full extent permitted by the Constitution, statute, and rule; and 3. within seven (7) days of the date of this Referral Order, the plaintiff(s) shall file the Procedures Order, which is found on Judge Stark's website (see www.ded.uscourts.gov). ORDERED by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/26/18. Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-01424-LPS, 1:18-cv-01425-LPS (ntl)
September 19, 2018 Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-01424-LPS, 1:18-cv-01425-LPS (rjb)
September 17, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Location Based Services, LLC. Mapillary Inc. served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (Brauerman, Stephen)
September 13, 2018 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,311,733. (crb)
September 13, 2018 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (crb)
September 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Mapillary Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2459173.) - filed by Location Based Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(crb)
September 13, 2018 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Mapillary Inc. on 9/13/2018. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (crb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Location Based Services, LLC v. Mapillary Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mapillary Inc.
Represented By: Joseph R. Klinicki
Represented By: Jack B. Blumenfeld
Represented By: Shuang Zhao
Represented By: Michael J. Bonella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Location Based Services, LLC
Represented By: Stephen B. Brauerman
Represented By: Sara E. Bussiere
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?