Osborne v. Synchrony Bank et al
| Brendan Osborne |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union, LLC and Synchrony Bank |
| 1:2018cv01435 |
| September 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement as to Equifax only by Brendan Osborne (Garibian, Antranig) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement as to Trans Union only by Brendan Osborne (Garibian, Antranig) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement as to Synchrony Bank only by Brendan Osborne (Garibian, Antranig) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to November 9, 2018 - filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Grivner, Karen) |
SO ORDERED re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to November 9, 2018 filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Equifax Information Services, LLC answer due 11/9/2018). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/11/2018. (dlw)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Synchrony Bank to Respond to the Complaint to November 9, 2018 - filed by Synchrony Bank. (Chapple, Benjamin) |
|
SO ORDERED re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Synchrony Bank to Respond to the Complaint to November 9, 2018 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Synchrony Bank answer due 11/9/2018). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/10/2018. (dlw)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Trans Union, LLC.(Bennett, Blake) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Debra A. Miller for Trans Union, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (ceg) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brendan Osborne. Trans Union, LLC served on 9/20/2018, answer due 10/11/2018. (Garibian, Antranig) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brendan Osborne. Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 9/20/2018, answer due 10/11/2018. (Garibian, Antranig) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Debra A. Miller - filed by Trans Union, LLC. (Bennett, Blake) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc. for Trans Union, LLC filed by Trans Union, LLC. (Bennett, Blake) |
|
SO ORDERED re #4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Debra A. Miller filed by Trans Union, LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/25/2018. (dlw)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (jcs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Equifax Information Services, LLC, Synchrony Bank, Trans Union, LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2460881.) - filed by Brendan Osborne. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(jcs) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Equifax Information Services, LLC on 9/17/2018; Synchrony Bank on 9/17/2018; Trans Union, LLC on 9/17/2018. Summons mailed to counsels Philadelphia office. (jcs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
