Carbonite, Inc. v. SunGard Availability Services LP et al
| Carbonite, Inc. |
| SunGard Availability Services LP and SunGard Availability Services (Canada) Ltd. |
| 1:2018cv01471 |
| September 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Carbonite, Inc. as to All Parties (Kittila, Theodore) |
| CASE CLOSED per D.I. #4 . (nms) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms) |
| No Summons Issued. (sar) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Carbonite, Inc.. (sar) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against SunGard Availability Services (Canada) Ltd., SunGard Availability Services LP - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2466629.) - filed by Carbonite, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
