Olsen v. Engility Holdings, Inc. et al
| Karl Olsen |
| Darryll J. Pines, Katharina G. McFarland, Science Applications International Corporation, Raptors Merger Sub, Inc., David A. Savner, Engility Holdings, Inc., Peter Marino, Steven A. Denning, Charles S. Ream, William G. Tobin, David J. Topper, Lynn A. Dugle, David M. Kerko, Anthony Principi and John W. Barter, III |
| 1:2018cv01737 |
| November 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| No Summons Issued. (crb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (crb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against John W. Barter, III, Steven A. Denning, Lynn A. Dugle, Engility Holdings, Inc., David M. Kerko, Peter Marino, Katharina G. McFarland, Darryll J. Pines, Anthony Principi, Raptors Merger Sub, Inc., Charles S. Ream, David A. Savner, Science Applications International Corporation, William G. Tobin, David J. Topper - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2496344.) - filed by Karl Olsen. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(crb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
