Cropper v. Metzger et al
| A'keem Jamal Grinnell Cropper |
| Matthew Denn and Dana Metzger |
| 1:2018cv01958 |
| December 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING application for writ of habeas corpus and DENYING writ (copy to pltf.) (CASE CLOSED), #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by A'keem Jamal Grinnell Cropper. ORDER re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by A'keem Jamal Grinnell Cropper is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state remedies. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 12/28/18. (sar)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 12/28/18. (sar) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - filed by A'keem Jamal Grinnell Cropper.(nmg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by A'keem Jamal Grinnell Cropper. (nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
