Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Intel Corporation
| Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC |
| Intel Corporation |
| 1:2018cv01977 |
| December 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 1, 2019 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 1, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation, Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Intel Corporation answer due 3/1/2019. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/28/2018. (fms)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC. Intel Corporation served on 12/18/2018, answer due 1/8/2019. (Brauerman, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,335,392; 8,442,118; 8,526,502. (nmg) |
| Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,929,609; 7,982,799; 7,995,793; 8,155,459. (nmg) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,050,114; 8,385,426; 6,760,376; 6,782,054. (nmg) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Intel Corporation - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2524388.) - filed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Intel Corporation on 12/13/2018. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Intel Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Stephen B. Brauerman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Intel Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Jack B. Blumenfeld |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
