Alspaugh et al v. KaoneticsTechnologies Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Robert W. Alspaugh and Peggy Ann Alspaugh
Defendant: KaoneticsTechnologies Inc. and Gary J. Graham
Case Number: 1:2018cv02052
Filed: December 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #5 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint to March 5, 2019 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Gary J. Graham answer due 3/5/2019). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/19/2019. (nms)
February 18, 2019 Filing 5 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint to March 5, 2019 - filed by Gary J. Graham. (Kashishian, Ann)
February 18, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ann Marie Kashishian on behalf of Gary J. Graham (Kashishian, Ann)
February 11, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert W. Alspaugh. Gary J. Graham served on 1/26/2019, answer due 2/19/2019. (Kercsmar, Geoffrey)
February 11, 2019 CORRECTING ENTRY: D.I. 3 has been removed from the docket. The filing was docketed as a Affidavit of Service, but upon review appeared to be a "Summons Returned Executed." Counsel shall refile the document using the correct filing event code. (nms)
January 2, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
December 27, 2018 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Gary J. Graham on 12/27/2018. (Summons form will be mailed to counsel). (rwc)
December 26, 2018 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (rwc)
December 26, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT - filed against Gary J. Graham, KaoneticsTechnologies Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2532192.) - filed by Robert W. Alspaugh, Peggy Ann Alspaugh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(rwc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alspaugh et al v. KaoneticsTechnologies Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert W. Alspaugh
Represented By: Geoffrey S. Kercsmar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peggy Ann Alspaugh
Represented By: Geoffrey S. Kercsmar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KaoneticsTechnologies Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary J. Graham
Represented By: Ann Marie Kashishian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?