In re: Delaware Claims Processing Facility
| National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA |
| Travelers Casualty and Surety Company and Delaware Claims Processing Facility |
| 1:2018mc00315 |
| October 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Remark : Case transferred from Delaware has been opened in Southern District of New York as case 1:18-mc-00531, filed 11/19/2018. (rwc) |
Filing 5
ORDER re #4 STIPULATION REGARDING NATIONAL UNION'S REQUEST TO TRANSFER ITS MOTION TO COMPEL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 45(f) OR, ALTERNATIVELY, GRANT ITS MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FROM DELAWARE CLAIMS PROCESSING FACILITY filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. The Motion shall be transferred for all purposes to United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York for determination by Judge Bernstein. Related to S.D.N.Y. Bankr. Case No. 13-bk-10687 (smb) and Adv. Proc. No. 15-ap-01095 (smb). Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/13/2018. (fms)
|
| Delaware Claims Processing Facility added as Respondent and Attorney Marla Rosoff Eskin added for Delaware Claims Processing Facility added per D.I. #4 . (fms) |
| Case transferred electronically to United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Motion shall be transferred for all purposes to United States Bankruptcy Court for determination by Judge Berstein (D.I. #5 ). Related to S.D.N.Y. Bankr. Case No. 13-bk-10687 (smb) and Adv. Proc. No. 15-ap-01095 (smb) (fms) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED ORDER (Stipulation) National Union's Request to Transfer Its Motion to Compel Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 45(f) or, Alternatively, Grant Its Motion to Compel Discovery from Delaware Claims Processing Facility by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. (Casarino, Marc) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Oral Argument re #1 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support of National Union's Request/Motion by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (crb) |
| Filing 2 AFFIRMATION of R. James Bradford in support of #1 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support of National Union's Request/Motion filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit H Part 2, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K)(crb) |
| Filing 1 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support of National Union's Request/MOTION to Transfer Its Motion to Compel Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 45(f) or, Alternatively, Grant Its Motion to Compel Discovery from Delaware Claims Processing Facility filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order 1, #2 Text of Proposed Order 2)(crb) Modified on 10/25/2018 (rwc). |
| Remark : Case submitted for routine judicial case assignment (10/31/18). Counsel may submit a letter requesting Expedited Handling and the reasons therefor. Bound paper courtesy copies would be required to be submitted to the Clerk's Office as soon as practicable after such request has been made. (crb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
