Scarantino v. Investment Technology Group, Inc. et al
| Richard Scarantino |
| Investment Technology Group, Inc., R. Jarrett Lilien, Kevin J. Lynch, Lee M. Shavel, Timothy L. Jones, Steven S. Wood, Brian G. Cartwright, Minder Cheng and Francis J. Troise |
| 1:2019cv00024 |
| January 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE CLOSED (ntl) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Richard Scarantino (Serra, Gina) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00023-LPS, 1:19-cv-00024-LPS (rjb) |
| No Summons Issued. (lak) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT - filed with Jury Demand against Brian G. Cartwright, Minder Cheng, Investment Technology Group, Inc., Timothy L. Jones, R. Jarrett Lilien, Kevin J. Lynch, Lee M. Shavel, Francis J. Troise, Steven S. Wood - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2537261.) - filed by Richard Scarantino. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
