Wang v. TESARO, Inc. et al
| Elaine Wang |
| Adriatic Acquisition Corporation, Garry Nicholson, Lonnie Moulder, Mary Lynne Hedley, Beth Seidenberg, Pascale Witz, James Armitage, TESARO, Inc., Lawrence Alleva, Earl Collier, Jr., Kavita Patel, David Mott and GlaxoSmithKline plc |
| 1:2019cv00045 |
| January 8, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Elaine Wang (Long, Brian) |
| CASE CLOSED (ntl) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| No Summons Issued. (ceg) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ceg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF SECTIONS 14(e), 14(d) AND 20(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 filed with Jury Demand against Adriatic Acquisition Corporation, Lawrence Alleva, James Armitage, Earl Collier, Jr, GlaxoSmithKline plc, Mary Lynne Hedley, David Mott, Lonnie Moulder, Garry Nicholson, Kavita Patel, Beth Seidenberg, TESARO, Inc., Pascale Witz - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2539631.) - filed by Elaine Wang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ceg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.