Peterson v. Trans Union, LLC
| Latoya Peterson |
| Trans Union, LLC |
| 1:2019cv00115 |
| January 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement as to Trans Union by Latoya Peterson (Garibian, Antranig) |
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION Extending Trans Union, LLC's Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to March 21, 2019 filed by Trans Union, LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/21/19. (ntl)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION Extending Trans Union, LLC's Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to March 21, 2019 by Trans Union, LLC. (Bennett, Blake) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Scott E. Brady for Trans Union, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00114-LPS, 1:19-cv-00115-LPS(ceg) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Latoya Peterson. Trans Union, LLC served on 1/29/2019, answer due 2/19/2019. (Garibian, Antranig) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Scott E. Brady filed by Trans Union, LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/8/19. (ntl)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Scott E. Brady - filed by Trans Union, LLC. (Bennett, Blake) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for Trans Union, LLC filed by Trans Union, LLC. (Bennett, Blake) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00114-LPS, 1:19-cv-00115-LPS (rjb) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Trans Union, LLC on 1/22/2019. (Summons mailed to Philadelphia office per filing party's request). (lak) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT - filed with Jury Demand against Trans Union, LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2548798.) - filed by Latoya Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Peterson v. Trans Union, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Trans Union, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Blake A. Bennett |
| Represented By: | Scott E. Brady |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Latoya Peterson | |
| Represented By: | Antranig N. Garibian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
