Witmer v. Loxo Oncology, Inc. et al
Colleen Witmer |
Avi Z. Naider, Loxo Oncology, Inc., Joshua H. Bilenker, Keith T. Flaherty, Alan Fuhrman, Steven D. Harr, Steve Elms, Lori A. Kunkel, Bowfin Acquisition Corporation, Tim Mayleben and Eli Lilly and Company |
1:2019cv00135 |
January 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Leonard P Stark |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Colleen Witmer (Long, Brian) |
CASE CLOSED (ntl) |
Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00133-LPS, 1:19-cv-00135-LPS (rjb) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ceg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 filed against Joshua H. Bilenker, Bowfin Acquisition Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company, Steve Elms, Keith T. Flaherty, Alan Fuhrman, Steven D. Harr, Lori A. Kunkel, Loxo Oncology, Inc., Tim Mayleben, Avi Z. Naider - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2551988.) - filed by Colleen Witmer. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ceg) |
No Summons Issued. (ceg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.