Encoditech LLC v. Conair Corporation
| Encoditech LLC |
| Conair Corporation |
| 1:2019cv00150 |
| January 28, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,321,095 B1. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal)(nms) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Encoditech LLC (Devlin, Timothy) |
| CASE CLOSED per D.I. #9 . (nms) |
| Filing 8 STATUS REPORT, by Encoditech LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) Modified on 3/25/2019 (nms). |
Filing 7
ORAL ORDER: An answer was due to be filed on 3/21/2019 (see D.I. #6 ), and to date none has been filed. Now the Plaintiff shall file a status letter within 3 days from the entry of this Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/22/2019. (nms)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to March 21, 2019 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Conair Corporation answer due 3/21/2019). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/22/2019. (nms)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to March 21, 2019 - filed by Encoditech LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Encoditech LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Encoditech LLC. Conair Corporation served on 1/31/2019, answer due 2/21/2019. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00150-RGA, 1:19-cv-00151-RGA (rjb) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,321,095 B1. (lak) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against Conair Corporation - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2554333.) - filed by Encoditech LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(lak) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Conair Corporation on 1/28/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Encoditech LLC v. Conair Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Encoditech LLC | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Devlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Conair Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
