Realtime Data LLC v. Nimbus Data, Inc.
| Realtime Data LLC and Realtime Data LLC doing business as IXO |
| Nimbus Data, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00279 |
| February 8, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move against, answer, or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint to May 2, 2019 filed by Nimbus Data, Inc., Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Nimbus Data, Inc. answer due 5/2/2019. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/3/2019. (fms)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move against, answer, or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint to May 2, 2019 - filed by Nimbus Data, Inc.. (Vrana, Robert) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Nimbus Data, Inc. to move against, answer or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint to April 4, 2019 filed by Nimbus Data, Inc. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Nimbus Data, Inc. answer due 4/4/2019. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/5/2019. (fms)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Nimbus Data, Inc. to move against, answer or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint to April 4, 2019 - filed by Nimbus Data, Inc.. (Vrana, Robert) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Jay C. Chung, Marc A. Fenster, Paul Kroeger, and Reza Mirzaie for Realtime Data LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (ddp) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (bkb) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul A. Kroeger, Marc A. Fenster, Reza Mizaie, C. Jay Chung, filed by Realtime Data LLC. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/14/2019. (nms)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Realtime Data LLC. Nimbus Data, Inc. served on 2/12/2019, answer due 3/5/2019. (Brauerman, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul A. Kroeger, Marc A. Fenster, Reza Mizaie, C. Jay Chung - filed by Realtime Data LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certification by Counsel to Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice, #2 Certification by Counsel to Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice, #3 Certification by Counsel To Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice, #4 Certification by Counsel To Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice)(Brauerman, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,019,458; 9,667,751; 8,933,825. (nmg) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Nimbus Data, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2566036.) - filed by Realtime Data LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Nimbus Data, Inc. on 2/8/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
