Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Sandoz Inc.
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. |
Sandoz Inc. |
1:2019cv00312 |
February 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Richard G Andrews |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Christie Larochelle for Sandoz Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (amf) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Keith A. Zullow for Sandoz Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (amf) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Julius Jefferson for Sandoz Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr) |
SO ORDERED, re #12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Keith A. Zullow, Emily L. Rapalino, Julius Jefferson, and Christie Larochelle, filed by Sandoz Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/11/2019. (nms) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Keith A. Zullow, Emily L. Rapalino, Julius Jefferson, and Christie Larochelle - filed by Sandoz Inc.. (Gattuso, Dominick) |
Filing 11 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Novartis AG for Sandoz Inc. filed by Sandoz Inc.. (Gattuso, Dominick) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Defenses, and COUNTERCLAIMS against All Plaintiffs by Sandoz Inc.. (Attachments: #2 Certificate of Service)(Gattuso, Dominick) Modified on 4/10/2019 (nms). |
CORRECTING ENTRY: The disclosure statement filed as an attachment at D.I. 10 has been removed from that entry. Disclosure statements are to be filed independently on the docket. Counsel shall refile accordingly. (nms) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Anthony H. Sheh for Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00310-RGA et al.(ddp) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Anthony H. Sheh for Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00310-RGA et al.(ceg) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jingyuan Luo for Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00310-RGA et al.(ceg) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to ANSWER Complaint to April 10, 2019 - filed by Sandoz Inc.. (Gattuso, Dominick) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Dominick T. Gattuso on behalf of Sandoz Inc. (Gattuso, Dominick) |
SO ORDERED, re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to April 10, 2019 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Sandoz Inc. answer due 4/10/2019). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/28/2019. (nms) |
Filing 7 DECLARATION of Mailing regarding service on Sandoz Inc. made on February 14, 2019, by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-B)(Silver, Daniel) Modified on 2/25/2019 (nms). |
SO ORDERED, re (6 in 19-cv-321-RGA, 6 in 19-cv-318-RGA, 6 in 19-cv-312-RGA, 6 in 19-cv-314-RGA, 6 in 19-cv-310-RGA, 6 in 19-cv-316-RGA, 6 in 19-cv-313-RGA, 6 in 19-cv-320-RGA, 6 in 19-cv-347-RGA, 6 in 1:19-cv-00319-RGA, 6 in 19-cv-317-RGA, 6 in 19-cv-311-RGA, 6 in 19-cv-315-RGA) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Bruce R. Genderson, Jessamyn S. Berniker, Stanley E. Fisher, Shaun P. Mahaffy, Anthony H. Sheh, and Jinyuan Luo, filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/22/2019. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00310-RGA et al.(nms) |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00310-UNA et al.(bkb) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Bruce R. Genderson, Jessamyn S. Berniker, Stanley E. Fisher, Shaun P. Mahaffy, Anthony H. Sheh, and Jingyuan Luo - filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Certifications)(Silver, Daniel) Modified on 2/22/2019 (nms). |
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Sandoz Inc. on 2/14/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (nmg) |
Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Merck & Co., Inc. for Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (nmg) |
Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,326,708. (nmg) |
Filing 3 Supplemental information for patent cases involving an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) - Date Patentee(s) Received Notice: 12/20/2010. Date of Expiration of Patent: 11/24/2026. (nmg) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed against Sandoz Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2569821.) - filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.