Sisvel International S.A. v. GTT Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sisvel International S.A.
Defendant: GTT Communications, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv00328
Filed: February 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Christopher J Burke
Referring Judge: Leonard P Stark
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2019 Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 17, 2019 - filed by Sisvel International S.A.. (Devlin, Timothy)
April 15, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED D.I. #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 17, 2019 filed by Sisvel International S.A. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 4/15/2019. (dlb)
March 15, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED D.I. #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to April 17, 2019 filed by Sisvel International S.A. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 3/15/2019. (dlb)
March 14, 2019 Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to April 17, 2019 - filed by Sisvel International S.A.. (Lennon, James)
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED D.I. (6 in 1:19-cv-00330-LPS-CJB, 5 in 1:19-cv-00329-LPS-CJB, 6 in 1:19-cv-00328-LPS-CJB, 7 in 1:19-cv-00331-LPS-CJB) Proposed Procedures Order filed by Sisvel International S.A. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/28/2019. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00331-LPS-CJB, 1:19-cv-00328-LPS-CJB, 1:19-cv-00329-LPS-CJB, 1:19-cv-00330-LPS-CJB(dlb)
February 27, 2019 Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER Procedures Order by Sisvel International S.A.. (Devlin, Timothy)
February 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORAL REFERRAL ORDER: This case will be governed by Judge Stark's Revised Procedures for Managing Patent Cases (see www.ded.uscourts.gov). In accordance with the Revised Procedures, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. any and all matters relating to scheduling, including entry of a Scheduling Order, are referred to Magistrate Judge Burke; 2. any and all motions to dismiss, stay, and/or transfer venue, relating to all or any part of the case, whenever such motions may be filed, are referred to Judge Burke for disposition or report and recommendation, to the full extent permitted by the Constitution, statute, and rule; and 3. within seven (7) days of the date of this Referral Order, the plaintiff(s) shall file the Procedures Order, which is found on Judge Stark's website (see www.ded.uscourts.gov). ORDERED by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/27/19. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00328-LPS, 1:19-cv-00329-LPS, 1:19-cv-00330-LPS, 1:19-cv-00331-LPS (ntl)
February 25, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sisvel International S.A.. GTT Communications, Inc. served on 2/25/2019, answer due 3/18/2019. (Devlin, Timothy)
February 21, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00328-UNA, 1:19-cv-00329-UNA, 1:19-cv-00330-UNA, 1:19-cv-00331-UNA(bkb)
February 21, 2019 CORRECTING ENTRY: The Civil Cover Sheet attached to DI 1 was replaced with the correct document. (rwc)
February 15, 2019 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,768,772 B2 ;US 7,508,867 B2 ;US 6,952,442 B2 ;US 6,987,802B2 ;US 6,934,326 B2. (rwc)
February 15, 2019 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (rwc)
February 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against GTT Communications, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2571927.) - filed by Sisvel International S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Civil Cover Sheet)(rwc) (Attachment 22 replaced on 2/21/2019) (rwc).
February 15, 2019 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to GTT Communications, Inc. on 2/15/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (rwc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sisvel International S.A. v. GTT Communications, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sisvel International S.A.
Represented By: Timothy Devlin
Represented By: James M Lennon
Represented By: James Michael Lennon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GTT Communications, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?