CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Snap Inc.
CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. |
Snap Inc. |
1:2019cv00534 |
March 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Leonard P Stark |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc..Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 7/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Devlin, Timothy) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Reuben H. Chen for Snap Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr) |
Filing 16 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Snap Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 7/12/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Ying, Jennifer) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Snap Inc.. (Ying, Jennifer) |
SO ORDERED, re #14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Heidi L. Keefe, Reuben H. Chen, Mark Weinstein and Lauren Krickl filed by Snap Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 6/26/19. (ntl) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Heidi L. Keefe, Reuben H. Chen, Mark Weinstein and Lauren Krickl - filed by Snap Inc.. (Jacobs, Karen) |
SO ORDERED, re #13 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint to June 28, 2019 filed by CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 6/5/19. (ntl) |
Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint to June 28, 2019 - filed by CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc.. (Devlin, Timothy) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of Address by Timothy Devlin (Devlin, Timothy) |
Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Snap Inc.- filed by CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Devlin, Timothy) |
Filing 10 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Other Affiliate Tencent Holdings Limited for Snap Inc. filed by Snap Inc.. (Jacobs, Karen) |
Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Snap Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 5/31/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Jacobs, Karen) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Snap Inc.. (Jacobs, Karen) |
SO ORDERED, re #7 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to ANSWER Complaint to May 17, 2019 filed by Snap Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 4/17/19. (ntl) |
Filing 7 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to ANSWER Complaint to May 17, 2019 - filed by Snap Inc.. (Jacobs, Karen) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Austin L. Hansley for CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00292-LPS et al.(ceg) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc.. Snap Inc. served on 3/27/2019, answer due 4/17/2019. (Devlin, Timothy) |
SO ORDERED, re (5 in 1:19-cv-00535-LPS) (5 in 1:19-cv-00534-LPS) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Austin Hansley filed by CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/21/19. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00534-LPS, 1:19-cv-00535-LPS (ntl) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Austin Hansley - filed by CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc.. (Devlin, Timothy) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc.. (Devlin, Timothy) |
Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00534-LPS, 1:19-cv-00535-LPS (rjb) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 7,162,696 B2. (sar) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sar) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Snap Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2598186.) - filed by CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(sar) |
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Snap Inc. on 3/19/2019. (sar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Snap Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Snap Inc. | |
Represented By: | Karen Jacobs |
Represented By: | Reuben H. Chen |
Represented By: | Jennifer Ying |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Timothy Devlin |
Represented By: | Austin L. Hansley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.