Carter v. Richman et al.
| Jermaine Layton Carter |
| Marc Richman and Steven Wesley |
| 1:2019cv00536 |
| March 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Plaintiff has not paid the $400.00 filing fee owed, therefore the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice and the case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/14/2019. (lak)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER. Plaintff has filed at least 3 actions that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim, and plaintiff does not claim to be in imminent danger. Plaintiff has 30 days to reinstate this action by paying the $400.00 filing fee. Failure to submit filing fee shall result in dismissal. (Copy to pltf. with Mag. Consent Form) Notice of Compliance deadline set for 4/29/2019.. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/29/19. (sar)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00536-CFC, 1:19-cv-00550-CFC (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT - (NO IFP, NO FEE PAID) filed pursuant to 42:1983 against Marc Richman, Steven Wesley - filed by Jermaine Layton Carter. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
