Tenaha Licensing LLC v. Ascom (US) Inc.
| Tenaha Licensing LLC |
| Ascom (US) Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00568 |
| March 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER, IT IS ORDERED that, on or before July 15, 2019, counsel for plaintiff shall inform the court as to whether the need for coordinated discovery and/or Markman proceedings is anticipated as to the related cases and, if so, when a joint scheduling conference might most efficiently be conducted. ORDER, Setting Deadlines: (Notice of Compliance deadline set for 7/15/2019.) Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/28/2019. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00208-CFC, 1:19-cv-00568-CFC, 1:19-cv-00569-CFC(nmf)
|
| Filing 14 REPLY BRIEF re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Ascom (US) Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 13 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Tenaha Licensing LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 6/10/2019. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Ricardo J. Bonilla, Andria Rae Crisler, and Neil J. McNabnay for Ascom (US) Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (amf) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #8 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Tenaha Licensing LLC.(Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Neil McNabnay, Ricardo J. Bonilla and Andria Rae Crisler - filed by Ascom (US) Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Neil McNabnay, Ricardo J. Bonilla and Andria Rae Crisler filed by Ascom (US) Inc. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/26/2019. (fms)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #10 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and for Defendant to file its reply to June 6, 2019 and June 20, 2019, respectively filed by Tenaha Licensing LLC. Set Briefing Schedule: re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Answering Brief due 6/6/2019., Reply Brief due 6/20/2019.). Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/24/2019. (fms)
|
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and for Defendant to file its reply to June 6, 2019 and June 20, 2019, respectively - filed by Tenaha Licensing LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Ascom (US) Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand Affirmative Defenses, and, COUNTERCLAIM against Tenaha Licensing LLC by Ascom (US) Inc..(Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Ascom (US) Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 5/6/2019. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Ascom (US) Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Tenaha Licensing LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00568-CFC, 1:19-cv-00569-CFC, 1:19-cv-00570-CFC (rjb) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tenaha Licensing LLC. Ascom (US) Inc. served on 4/1/2019, answer due 4/22/2019. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 8,238,869 B2. (lak) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against Ascom (US) Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2604274.) - filed by Tenaha Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(lak) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Ascom (US) Inc. on 3/26/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tenaha Licensing LLC v. Ascom (US) Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ascom (US) Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy Douglas Anderson |
| Represented By: | Andria Rae Crisler |
| Represented By: | Neil J. McNabnay |
| Represented By: | Ricardo J. Bonilla |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tenaha Licensing LLC | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Devlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
