Tenaha Licensing LLC v. PerfectServe, Inc.
Tenaha Licensing LLC |
PerfectServe, Inc. |
1:2019cv00569 |
March 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER, IT IS ORDERED that, on or before July 15, 2019, counsel for plaintiff shall inform the court as to whether the need for coordinated discovery and/or Markman proceedings is anticipated as to the related cases and, if so, when a joint scheduling conference might most efficiently be conducted. ORDER, Setting Deadlines: (Notice of Compliance deadline set for 7/15/2019.) Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/28/2019. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00208-CFC, 1:19-cv-00568-CFC, 1:19-cv-00569-CFC(nmf) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Trial Demanded , COUNTERCLAIM against Tenaha Licensing LLC by PerfectServe, Inc..(DiTomo, John) |
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer complaint to May 28, 2019 filed by PerfectServe, Inc., Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: PerfectServe, Inc. answer due 5/28/2019. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/29/2019. (nmf) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer complaint to May 28, 2019 - filed by PerfectServe, Inc.. (Mullin, Elizabeth) |
Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Tenaha Licensing LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00568-CFC, 1:19-cv-00569-CFC, 1:19-cv-00570-CFC (rjb) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tenaha Licensing LLC. PerfectServe, Inc. served on 4/1/2019, answer due 4/22/2019. (Devlin, Timothy) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 8,238,869 B2. (lak) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against PerfectServe, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2604278.) - filed by Tenaha Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (lak) |
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to PerfectServe, Inc. on 3/26/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tenaha Licensing LLC v. PerfectServe, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: PerfectServe, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Anne Mullin |
Represented By: | John Patrick DiTomo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tenaha Licensing LLC | |
Represented By: | Timothy Devlin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.