Jezign Licensing, LLC v. Starbury Corporation
| Jezign Licensing, LLC |
| Starbury Corporation |
| 1:2019cv00692 |
| April 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED re #7 Second STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint to July 10, 2019 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Starbury Corporation answer due 7/10/2019). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/4/2019. (dlw)
|
| Filing 7 Second STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint to July 10, 2019 - filed by Starbury Corporation. (DeSantis, Kasey) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Defendant to Respond to the Complaint to June 10, 2019 - filed by Starbury Corporation. (DeSantis, Kasey) |
|
SO ORDERED re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Defendant to Respond to the Complaint to June 10, 2019 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Starbury Corporation answer due 6/10/2019). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/3/2019. (dlw)
|
| Summons Reissued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Starbury Corporation. (sar) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Jezign Licensing, LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jezign Licensing, LLC. Starbury Corporation served on 4/18/2019, answer due 5/9/2019. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number U.S. D554,848 S1. (amf) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (amf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INGRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against Starbury Corporation - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2621241.) - filed by Jezign Licensing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(amf) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Starbury Corporation on 4/17/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (amf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jezign Licensing, LLC v. Starbury Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jezign Licensing, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Devlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Starbury Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Kasey Hacker DeSantis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
