Cassiopeia IP LLC v. Best Buy Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: Cassiopeia IP LLC
Defendant: Best Buy Co., Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv00799
Filed: April 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Timothy Devlin (Devlin, Timothy)
May 23, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cassiopeia IP LLC. Best Buy Co., Inc. served on 5/7/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. (Devlin, Timothy)
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to July 12, 2019 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Best Buy Co., Inc. answer due 5/21/2019). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/21/2019. (nms)
May 20, 2019 Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to July 12, 2019 - filed by Best Buy Co., Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack) Modified on 5/21/2019 (nms).
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re (4 in 19-cv-799-RGA, 4 in 19-cv-801-RGA, 4 in 19-cv-800-RGA) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Eugenio J. Torres-Oyola and Jean G. Vidal-Font, filed by Cassiopeia IP LLC. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/9/2019. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00799-RGA, 1:19-cv-00800-RGA, 1:19-cv-00801-RGA(nms)
May 8, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00799-RGA, 1:19-cv-00800-RGA, 1:19-cv-00801-RGA (rjb)
May 3, 2019 Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Cassiopeia IP LLC. (Devlin, Timothy)
May 3, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Eugenio J. Torres-Oyola and Jean G. Vidal-Font - filed by Cassiopeia IP LLC. (Devlin, Timothy)
April 30, 2019 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 7,322,046 B2. (amf)
April 30, 2019 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (amf)
April 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT filed with Jury Demand against Best Buy Co., Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2631581) - filed by Cassiopeia IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(amf)
April 30, 2019 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Best Buy Co., Inc. on 4/30/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (amf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cassiopeia IP LLC v. Best Buy Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Best Buy Co., Inc.
Represented By: Jack B. Blumenfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cassiopeia IP LLC
Represented By: Timothy Devlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?