In re: Imerys Talc America, Inc.
| Imerys Talc America, Inc. and Future Claimants' Representative |
| Cyprus Historical Excess Insurers |
| 1:2019cv00944 |
| May 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter to The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from Marcos A. Ramos regarding Proposed Briefing Schedule - re #6 Letter, #5 Letter. (Ramos, Marcos) |
| Filing 8 DESIGNATION OF RECORD on Appeal filed by Cyprus Historical Excess Insurers // Appellants' Corrected Designation of Items to be Included in the Record on Appeal and Statement of Issues Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8009(a) (Stamoulis, Stamatios) Modified on 7/15/2019 (dlw). |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION OF RECORD on Appeal filed by Imerys Talc America, Inc., Future Claimants' Representative // Designation of Additional Items to be Included in Record of Appeal (Harron, Edwin) Modified on 7/15/2019 (dlw). |
| Filing 6 Letter to The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from Stamatios Stamoulis regarding briefing schedule. (Weinblatt, Richard) |
| Filing 5 Letter to The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from Marcos A. Ramos regarding briefing schedule. (Ramos, Marcos) |
| Filing 4 Recommendation that Bankruptcy Appeal be withdrawn from mandatory mediation. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 6/17/19. (cak) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 3 ORAL ORDER: Pursuant to this Court's Standing Order dated September 11, 2012, regarding procedures to govern mediation of all appeals from the Bankruptcy Court which places such appeals in mandatory mediation; IT IS ORDERED that on or before 4:00 p.m., Wednesday, June 12, 2019, the parties shall advise in a joint written submission, no longer than three (3) pages in 12 point font, directed to Chief Magistrate Judge Thynge, their respective positions regarding mediation and reasoning for their positions, including whether the parties were previously or are presently involved in mediation or other ADR process. Should the parties jointly request the matter be removed from the mandatory mediation requirement, they are to provide a proposed briefing schedule and/or advise whether they feel a teleconference with a Magistrate Judge would be of assistance and why. This submission shall not be docketed, but shall be delivered to the Clerks Office of the District Court. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 5/22/19. (cak) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Docketing Bankruptcy Appeal. (ddp) (Main Document 2 replaced on 5/22/2019) (ddp). |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT appealing the Order entered on 5/8/2019 by The Honorable Laurie Selber Silverstein in Bankruptcy case number 19-10289 LSS. Fee Status Paid.- filed by Cyprus Historical Excess Insurers. (Attachments: #1 Bench Ruling on Motion, #2 Bankruptcy Appeal Transmittal)(ddp) |
| NO DESIGNATION OF RECORD FILED (ddp) |
| Notice of Bankruptcy Appeal Record Availability. DESIGNATED RECORD on Appeal is available electronically from the docket sheet on file in the Bankruptcy Court. Please do not send paper courtesy copies of the record on appeal to the Clerk's Office unless otherwise directed by chambers. (ddp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
