Hailo Technologies, LLC v. Flywheel Software, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hailo Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Flywheel Software, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv00949
Filed: May 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2019 Filing 9 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,756,913. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal)(nms)
July 2, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hailo Technologies, LLC as to Only Defendant (Pazuniak, George)
July 2, 2019 CASE CLOSED per D.I. #8 . (nms)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORAL ORDER: Defendant's answer was due to be filed on 6/18/2019 (see D.I. #4 ), and to date none has been filed. Now the parties shall file a status letter within 3 days from the entry of this Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/28/2019. (nms)
June 26, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Todd Young Brandt - filed by Hailo Technologies, LLC. (Pazuniak, George)
June 26, 2019 Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Hailo Technologies, LLC. (Pazuniak, George)
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Todd Young Brandt, filed by Hailo Technologies, LLC. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/26/2019. (nms)
June 26, 2019 Case Reassigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
May 30, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hailo Technologies, LLC. Flywheel Software, Inc. served on 5/28/2019, answer due 6/18/2019. (Pazuniak, George)
May 29, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
May 22, 2019 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,756,913. (nmg)
May 22, 2019 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg)
May 22, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Hailo Technologies, LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2648814.) - filed by Hailo Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg)
May 22, 2019 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Flywheel Software, Inc. on 5/22/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (nmg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hailo Technologies, LLC v. Flywheel Software, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hailo Technologies, LLC
Represented By: George Pazuniak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flywheel Software, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?