Smart Locking Technologies LLC v. Schlage Lock Company LLC
Smart Locking Technologies LLC |
Schlage Lock Company LLC |
1:2019cv00994 |
May 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Leonard P Stark |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to August 21, 2019 filed by Schlage Lock Company LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 7/17/19. (ntl) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to August 21, 2019 - filed by Schlage Lock Company LLC. (Stover, Chad) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to July 22, 2019 - filed by Schlage Lock Company LLC. (Stover, Chad) |
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to July 22, 2019 filed by Schlage Lock Company LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 6/13/19. (ntl) |
Case Reassigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00991-LPS, 1:19-cv-00992-LPS, 1:19-cv-00993-LPS, 1:19-cv-00994-LPS (rjb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00991-MN, 1:19-cv-00992-MN, 1:19-cv-00993-MN, 1:19-cv-00994-MN (nmg) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Smart Locking Technologies LLC. Schlage Lock Company LLC served on 5/30/2019, answer due 6/20/2019. (Weinblatt, Richard) |
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Schlage Lock Company LLC on 5/30/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (lak) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Smart Locking Technologies LLC. (lak) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,696,918 B2 ;US 6,300,873 B1. (lak) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT - filed with Jury Demand against Schlage Lock Company LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2653357.) - filed by Smart Locking Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smart Locking Technologies LLC v. Schlage Lock Company LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Smart Locking Technologies LLC | |
Represented By: | Stamatios Stamoulis |
Represented By: | Richard Charles Weinblatt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Schlage Lock Company LLC | |
Represented By: | Chad S.C. Stover |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.