Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Wonderwill Ltd. et al.
Symbology Innovations, LLC |
Zapper Marketing (USA) Inc., Zapper Marketing Limited and Wonderwill Ltd. |
1:2019cv01025 |
June 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Richard G Andrews |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer Complaint to August 23, 2019 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Wonderwill Ltd. answer due 8/23/2019; Zapper Marketing (USA) Inc. answer due 8/23/2019; Zapper Marketing Limited answer due 8/23/2019). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/23/2019. (nms) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer Complaint to August 23, 2019 - filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) Modified on 7/23/2019 (nms). |
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney M. Grant McArthur, filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/9/2019. (nms) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney M. Grant McArthur - filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to the Complaint to July 24, 2019 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Wonderwill Ltd. answer due 7/24/2019; Zapper Marketing (USA) Inc. answer due 7/24/2019; Zapper Marketing Limited answer due 7/24/2019). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/14/2019. (nms) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to July 24, 2019 - filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. Wonderwill Ltd. served on 6/5/2019, answer due 6/26/2019; Zapper Marketing (USA) Inc. served on 6/5/2019, answer due 6/26/2019; Zapper Marketing Limited served on 6/5/2019, answer due 6/26/2019. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00998-RGA, 1:19-cv-00999-RGA and 1:19-cv-01021-RGA through 1:19-cv-01025-RGA (rjb) |
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Wonderwill Ltd. on 6/3/2019; Zapper Marketing (USA) Inc. on 6/3/2019; Zapper Marketing Limited on 6/3/2019 (all c/o Corporation Service Company). Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (ddp) Modified on 6/3/2019 (ddp). |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (ddp) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,424,752 B2. (ddp) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ddp) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement filed with Jury Demand against Wonderwill Ltd., Zapper Marketing (USA) Inc., Zapper Marketing Limited - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2655767.) - filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit A, #15 Civil Cover Sheet)(ddp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.