Dale Progress Ltd. v. Car Connectivity Consortium, LLC
| Dale Progress Ltd. |
| Car Connectivity Consortium, LLC |
| 1:2019cv01041 |
| June 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 First AMENDED COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Car Connectivity Consortium, LLC - filed by Dale Progress Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Devlin, Timothy) Modified on 7/29/2019 (nms). |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to August 12, 2019 - filed by Dale Progress Ltd.. (Devlin, Timothy) |
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to August 12, 2019 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Car Connectivity Consortium, LLC answer due 8/12/2019). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/29/2019. (nms)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #5 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to July 29, 2019 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Car Connectivity Consortium, LLC answer due 7/29/2019). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/27/2019. (nms)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to July 29, 2019 - filed by Dale Progress Ltd.. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dale Progress Ltd.. Car Connectivity Consortium, LLC served on 6/7/2019, answer due 6/28/2019. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 9,686,504 B2 ;US 8,320,461 B2. (myr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AGAINST CAR CONNECTIVITY CONSORTIUM, LLC filed with Jury Demand against Car Connectivity Consortium, LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 311-2658073.) - filed by Dale Progress Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Car Connectivity Consortium, LLC on 6/5/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dale Progress Ltd. v. Car Connectivity Consortium, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Car Connectivity Consortium, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dale Progress Ltd. | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Devlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
