Rondevoo Technologies, LLC v. Sensirion Inc.
Rondevoo Technologies, LLC |
Sensirion Inc. |
1:2019cv01305 |
July 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Richard G Andrews |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Matthew J. Moffa and William J. McCabe for Sensirion Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney William J. McCabe and Matthew J. Moffa - filed by Sensirion Inc.. (Keller, Karen) |
SO ORDERED, re #12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney William J. McCabe and Matthew J. Moffa, filed by Sensirion Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/3/2019. (nms) |
CORRECTING ENTRY: The exhibits filed with the brief at D.I. #7 have been removed from that entry. The exhibits were filed in error. (nms) |
Filing 11 DECLARATION of Matthew J. Moffa, Volume 2 of 2 re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), by Sensirion Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit O, #2 Exhibit P, #3 Exhibit Q, #4 Exhibit R, #5 Exhibit S, #6 Exhibit T, #7 Exhibit U, #8 Exhibit V, #9 Exhibit W, #10 Exhibit X, #11 Exhibit Y, #12 Exhibit Z)(Shaw, John) Modified on 8/30/2019 (nms). |
Filing 10 DECLARATION of Matthew J. Moffa, Volume 1 of 2 re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), by Sensirion Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N)(Shaw, John) Modified on 8/30/2019 (nms). |
Filing 9 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Sensirion Holding AG Switzerland for Sensirion Inc. filed by Sensirion Inc.. (Shaw, John) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with jury demand by Sensirion Inc..(Shaw, John) |
Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) filed by Sensirion Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 9/12/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Y, # 26 Exhibit Z)(Shaw, John) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) - filed by Sensirion Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Shaw, John) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Respond to Complaint to 9/9/2019 - filed by Rondevoo Technologies, LLC. (Pazuniak, George) |
SO ORDERED, re #5 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to the Complaint to 9/9/2019 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Sensirion Inc. answer due 9/9/2019). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/29/2019. (nms) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rondevoo Technologies, LLC. Sensirion Inc. served on 7/17/2019, answer due 8/7/2019. (Pazuniak, George) |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,453,814 ;9,927,391. (mal) (Main Document 3 replaced on 7/12/2019) (rwc). |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against Sensirion Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2684279.) - filed by Rondevoo Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal) (Attachment 5 replaced on 7/12/2019) (rwc). |
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Sensirion Inc. on 7/12/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (mal) |
CORRECTING ENTRY: The CM/ECF Help Desk replaced the Civil Cover Sheet and Patent Report. (rwc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rondevoo Technologies, LLC v. Sensirion Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rondevoo Technologies, LLC | |
Represented By: | George Pazuniak |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sensirion Inc. | |
Represented By: | Matthew J. Moffa |
Represented By: | William J. McCabe |
Represented By: | John W. Shaw |
Represented By: | Karen Elizabeth Keller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.