Valyrian IP LLC v. Grandstream Networks, Inc.
| Valyrian IP LLC |
| Grandstream Networks, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01437 |
| July 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint to October 4, 2019 filed by Valyrian IP LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/18/19. (ntl)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint to October 4, 2019 - filed by Valyrian IP LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael G. Strapp and Safraz Ishmael - filed by Grandstream Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certification of Michael Strapp, #3 Certification of Safraz Ishmael, #4 Certificate of Service)(Kraft, Denise) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin E. Larson on behalf of Grandstream Networks, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Larson, Erin) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Denise Seastone Kraft on behalf of Grandstream Networks, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kraft, Denise) |
| Filing 6 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to September 20, 2019 - filed by Grandstream Networks, Inc.. (Biggs, Brian) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to September 20, 2019 filed by Grandstream Networks, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 8/20/19. (ntl)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael G. Strapp and Safraz Ishmael filed by Grandstream Networks, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 8/20/19. (ntl)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Michael G. Strapp and Safraz W. Ishmael for Grandstream Networks, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Valyrian IP LLC. Grandstream Networks, Inc. served on 8/1/2019, answer due 8/22/2019. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Grandstream Networks, Inc. on 8/1/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (mal) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Valyrian IP LLC. (mal) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,970,706 B2. (mal) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal) |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT- filed with Jury Demand against Grandstream Networks, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2698478.) - filed by Valyrian IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
