Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC v. LogMeIn, Inc.
| Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC |
| LogMeIn, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01545 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to 11/12/2019 - filed by LogMeIn, Inc.. (Keller, Karen) |
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to 11/12/2019 filed by LogMeIn, Inc., Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: LogMeIn, Inc. answer due 11/12/2019. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/7/2019. (fms)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to October 11, 2019 - filed by LogMeIn, Inc.. (Keller, Karen) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to October 11, 2019 filed by LogMeIn, Inc. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: LogMeIn, Inc. answer due 10/11/2019. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/28/2019. (fms)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC. LogMeIn, Inc. served on 8/21/2019, answer due 9/11/2019. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-01545-CFC, 1:19-cv-01547-CFC (rjb) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to LogMeIn, Inc. on 8/20/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (sam) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC. (sam) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 5,991,399. (sam) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against LogMeIn, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2711632.) - filed by Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2a, #3 Exhibit 2b, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC v. LogMeIn, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC | |
| Represented By: | Stamatios Stamoulis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LogMeIn, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Karen Elizabeth Keller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
