Pestell v. CytoDyn Inc. et al
Richard G. Pestell |
CytoDyn Operations Inc., CytoDyn Inc., Scott A. Kelly and Nader Z. Pourhassan |
1:2019cv01563 |
August 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Richard G Andrews |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SO ORDERED, re #19 STIPULATION and Proposed Order for Extension of Time to Respond to Motions to Dismiss (*Reset Briefing Schedule: re #17 MOTION to Dismiss, and #18 MOTION to Dismiss. Answering Briefs due 11/8/2019, Reply Brief due 12/2/2019). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/18/2019. (nms) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION and Proposed Order for Extension of Time to Respond to Motions to Dismiss - filed by Richard G. Pestell. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hochman, Michael) Modified on 10/18/2019 (nms). |
Set Answering Brief Deadline re #18 MOTION to Dismiss. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 10/25/2019. (nms) |
Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss - filed by Scott A. Kelly, Nader Z. Pourhassan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cronin, Laurence) Modified on 10/15/2019 (nms). |
Set Answering Brief Deadline re #17 MOTION to Dismiss. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 10/24/2019. (nms) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss - filed by CytoDyn Inc., CytoDyn Operations Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Holly, Timothy) Modified on 10/11/2019 (nms). |
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Steven M. Coren, Janice I. Daul, Benjamin M. Mather for Richard G. Pestell added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
Filing 16 Letter to The Honorable Richard G. Andrews, from Michael C. Hochman, Esq., regarding First Amended Complaint. (Hochman, Michael) Modified on 9/27/2019 (nms). |
Filing 15 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants - filed by Richard G. Pestell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Certificate of Service)(Hochman, Michael) Modified on 9/27/2019 (nms). |
CORRECTING ENTRY: The letter filed as an attachment to the pleading at D.I. 15 has been removed. (nms) |
Filing 14 JOINDER in #11 Motion to Dismiss, by Scott A. Kelly, Nader Z. Pourhassan. (Beste, Robert) Modified on 9/17/2019 (nms). |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Karl Beste, III on behalf of Scott A. Kelly, Nader Z. Pourhassan (Beste, Robert) |
CORRECTING ENTRY: The joinder filed as a motion at D.I. 14 has been removed from the docket. Counsel is directed to refile the joinder using the appropriate filing code. (nms) |
Set Answering Brief Deadline re #11 Partial MOTION to Dismiss. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 9/30/2019. (nms) |
Filing 12 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by CytoDyn Inc., CytoDyn Operations Inc.. (Holly, Timothy) |
Filing 11 Partial MOTION to Dismiss - filed by CytoDyn Inc., CytoDyn Operations Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Holly, Timothy) Modified on 9/16/2019 (nms). |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Michael Holly on behalf of CytoDyn Inc., CytoDyn Operations Inc. (Holly, Timothy) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Scott A. Kelly, M.D. on 9/3/2019, filed by Richard G. Pestell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hochman, Michael) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Nader Z. Pourhassan, Ph.D. on 8/30/2019, filed by Richard G. Pestell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hochman, Michael) |
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Benjamin M. Mather, filed by Richard G. Pestell, #3 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Steven M. Coren, filed by Richard G. Pestell, #4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Janice I. Daul, filed by Richard G. Pestell. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/28/2019. (nms) |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Benjamin M. Mather - filed by Richard G. Pestell. (Hochman, Michael) |
Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Richard G. Pestell. CytoDyn Operations Inc. served on 8/26/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. (Hochman, Michael) |
Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Richard G. Pestell. CytoDyn Inc. served on 8/26/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. (Hochman, Michael) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Janice I. Daul - filed by Richard G. Pestell. (Hochman, Michael) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Steven M. Coren - filed by Richard G. Pestell. (Hochman, Michael) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (amf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against CytoDyn Inc., CytoDyn Operations Inc., Scott A. Kelly, and Nader Z. Pourhassan - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2714410) - filed by Richard G. Pestell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(amf) |
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to CytoDyn Inc.; CytoDyn Operations Inc.; Scott A. Kelly; and Nader Z. Pourhassan on 8/22/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (amf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.