Winkler v. Carbon Black, Inc. et al
| Bernard Winkler |
| Ronald H. Nordin, Tom Killalea, Calistoga Merger Corp., Vanessa Pegueros, Jeffrey Fagnan, Jill A. Ward, VMware, Inc., Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr., Anthony Zingale, Patrick Morley and Carbon Black, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01704 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Remark: Case was previously opened as 19-cv-1764 in error and has been deleted. (nmg) |
| No Summons Issued. (myr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 filed with Jury Demand against Calistoga Merger Corp., Carbon Black, Inc., Jeffrey Fagnan, Tom Killalea, Patrick Morley, Ronald H. Nordin, Vanessa Pegueros, Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr., VMware, Inc., Jill A. Ward, Anthony Zingale - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 311-2728685.) - filed by Bernard Winkler. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
