El-Quadeer v. Commissioner Perry Phelps et al
| Abdul Haqq El-Quadeer |
| Warden David Pierce, Warden Robert May, Deputy Warden James Scarborough, Deputy Warden Parker, Sergeant Cupid, Connections, Commissioner Perry Phelps, CERT Team and Major Jeffery Carrothers |
| 1:2019cv01736 |
| September 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE (copy to pltf.) (CASE CLOSED) for the following reasons: On September 16, 2019 an Order (D.I. 2) was entered dismissing the Complaint and giving Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint on or before October 25, 2019. (D.I. 2) Plaintiff was warned that the Clerk of Court would close the case should he fail to timely file an Amended Complaint. The time has passed and Plaintiff failed to file an Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 11/12/2019. (mal)
|
| Remark: Copies of docket sheet and order mailed to Plaintiff (myr) (myr) (Entered: 09/18/2019) |
|
Filing 5
Filing Fee ORDER. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/25/19. (myr)
|
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Abdul Haqq El-Quadeer in further support of re D.I. #1 Complaint - filed by Abdull Hagg el-quadeer. (myr) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed pursuant to 42:1983 against CERT Team, Commissioner Perry Phelps, Connections, Deputy Warden James Scarborough, Deputy Warden Parker, Major Jeffery Carrothers, Sergeant Cupid, Warden David Pierce, Warden Robert May - filed by Abdul Haqq El-Quadeer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-20, #2 Exhibit 21-41A, #3 Exhibit 42-58, #4 Pro-Se Prepared Summons Form, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER, Plaintiffs' requests for counsel are DENIED without prejudice to renew. (D.I. 3, 22, 48 )Non-Party Nina Shahin's motion for joinder is DENIED. (D.I. [ 7]). Plaintiff Roman Shankaras' motions for leave to amend are DENIED as moot.(D.I. 20, 37 ) The Complaint is DISMISSED as frivolous and for failure to state claims upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) and 1915A(b)(1).The claims raised by Plaintiff Jarreau A. Ayers in Count II, the medical negligence claims, and Counts III and IV are DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendants CERT Team, Warden Robert May, and Sergeant Cupid are DISMISSED.The case is SEVERED into five individual cases, each with its own case number and title. Each newly-opened case shall include the original complaint (D.I. 1 ) and the filing fee order for each severed Plaintiff. Each Plaintiff (i.e., Dwayne Staats, Jarreau A. Ayers, Roman Shankaras, Lawrence Michaels, Abdul Haqq el-quadeer) who desires to go forward with the newly opened case shall file an amended complaint as to Count I and II in his own name or before October 25, 2019. Should any Plaintiff fail to timely file an amended complaint in his newly-opened case, the Clerk of Court will be directed to close that case. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.Party Lawrence Michaels, Nina Shahin, Roman Shankaras, Jarreau A. Ayers and Abdul Haqq El-Quadeer terminated.. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/16/2019. (myr)
|
| Filing 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/16/2019. (myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
