Duffy v. Tease et al
Charles E. Duffy, Sr. |
Ms. Kitchen, Karl Haller, Claud Tease and John Sandy |
1:2019cv01770 |
September 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Richard G Andrews |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/7/2019. (nms) |
Filing 8 Authorization by Charles E. Duffy, Sr requesting Prison Business Office to disburse payments to the Clerk of the Court. (copy of assessment order and authorization to Prison Business Office) (lak) |
|
Filing 6 Trust Fund Account Statement - filed by Charles E. Duffy, Sr. (amf) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Charles E. Duffy, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(amf) Modified on 10/8/2019 (nms). |
|
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel - filed by Charles E. Duffy, Sr. (sam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed pursuant to 42:1983 with Jury Demand against Karl Haller, Ms. Kitchen, John Sandy, Claud Tease - filed by Charles E. Duffy, Sr.(NO IFP, NO FEE PAID) (Attachments: #1 Check return letter)(sam) Modified on 9/23/2019 (sam). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.