XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. v. Samsung SDS Global SCL America, Inc.
Plaintiff: XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc.
Defendant: Samsung SDS Global SCL America, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv01833
Filed: September 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Maryellen Noreika
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2019 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Mark A. Mattingly for XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd)
October 10, 2019 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Lawrence C. Friedman for XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd)
October 9, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Lawrence C. Friedman and Mark A. Mattingly - filed by XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc.. (Dreisbach, Daniel)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Lawrence C. Friedman and Mark A. Mattingly filed by XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/9/2019. (dlw)
October 2, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
October 1, 2019 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Samsung SDS Global SCL America, Inc. on 10/1/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (sam)
September 30, 2019 Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent XPO Logistics, Inc., Corporate Parent XPO Logistics Supply Chain Holding Company for XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. filed by XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. (sam)
September 30, 2019 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam)
September 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Samsung SDS Global SCL America, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2743471.) - filed by XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. v. Samsung SDS Global SCL America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc.
Represented By: Nicole M. Henry
Represented By: Daniel E. Kaprow
Represented By: Daniel A. Dreisbach
Represented By: Kevin Michael Gallagher
Represented By: Lawrence C. Friedman
Represented By: Mark A. Mattingly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung SDS Global SCL America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?