Aperture Net LLC v. Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.
| Aperture Net LLC |
| Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Corporation and Sony Mobile Communications Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01840 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Orville R. Cockings for Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Gregory S. Gewirtz for Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Gregory S. Gewirtz and Orville R. Cockings, filed by Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/23/2019. (nms)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Gregory S. Gewirtz and Orville R. Cockings - filed by Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.. (Smith, Rodger) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Aperture Net LLC as to Sony Mobile Communications Inc. and Sony Corporation (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to December 9, 2019 - filed by Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.. (Smith, Rodger) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to December 9, 2019 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. answer due 12/9/2019). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/21/2019. (nms)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aperture Net LLC. Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. served on 10/2/2019, answer due 10/23/2019. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-01839-RGA, 1:19-cv-01840-RGA (rjb) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Sony Corporation on 10/1/2019; Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. on 10/1/2019; Sony Mobile Communications Inc. on 10/1/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (myr) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Aperture Net LLC. (myr) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,711,204 B2. (myr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Sony Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Mobile Communications Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 311-2743677.) - filed by Aperture Net LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
